|
1
|
- An Examination of the Impact of Traditional Chinese Medicine on Wildlife
Populations
|
|
2
|
- TCM → decline in wildlife, as many of its medicinal compounds rely
upon animal extracts
- At present limited to Asia →
other parts of the world.
- In 1994, China → 2,200 traditional medicine factories and employed
in related arenas, 460,000 people (Mainka, S.A., J.A. Mills, 1985)
- Annual illegal trade in wildlife products ~ 5-10 billion USD +
significant proportion → TCM demands (Still, J., 2003)
- Increasingly important for measures to be implemented if their
destruction is to be prevented
|
|
3
|
- laws concerning wildlife trade → revised + ↑ enforced,
punishment for transgression → more consequential
- Greater funding for research into alternatives
- Notion of urgency needs to be more seriously accorded to this matter.
- Many wildlife pops currently in Appendix I of CITES (species threatened
with extinction; trade in specimens of these species is permitted only
in exceptional circumstances)
|
|
4
|
- Among these, many favored as poaching targets due to imp in TCM.
- Asian tiger and bear populations need serious protection
- The history of their implication in Eastern medical practice and the
consequent crises they currently face will be examined in this report
|
|
5
|
- TCM dates back thousands of years.
- Earliest records → Emperor Shen Nong → therapeutic elements
of plants (Mainka, S.A., J.A. Mills, 1995)
- Official doctrine → Zhou dynasty (1122 B.C) and it was not until
the Han period (206-220 B.C.) that specific therapeutic remedies were
actually made available (Ibid)
|
|
6
|
- TCM → active throughout upcoming centuries + ↑ popularity
during reign of Mao Zedong, who advocated its importance.
- transfer of med info to West → Ming dynasty (1368-1644), but
popularity grew w Mao → integration of Eastern principles into
W.med (Mainka, S.A., J.A. Mills, 1992)
- Mao’s communist regime → ↓
China’s tiger pop for 2 other reasons
- 1-1949 anti-pest campaign (Chinese agriculture) (50s + 60s ~ 3000 tiger
skins) (Nowell, K., 2004)
- 2-Mao’s communist regime → migration out of China → throughout
Asia. With them, the Chinese
brought knowledge, culture + philosophies of medical practice (Ibid)
|
|
7
|
- Recently - resurgence of interest in TCM.
- (2003) estimate >25% pop uses meds associated w TCM (Still, J., 2003)
- -in Asiatic culture affiliated w status + power
- -cultural significance = means to preserve Eastern tradition in
changing, W-dominated world.
- -response to shortcomings in W med + ↑ used in growing Asian pops
of W hemisphere
|
|
8
|
- In East Asian pops, ++ China → political change → ↑ per cap income → ↑ freedom
possess sacred items for health preservation + symbol of wealth + power (Yi-Ming,
L., 1998)
- In Russia → free-market economy → ↓income →
threat to Russia’s tiger pop
- General rule = countries w wild tiger = poor → ↑ poaching +
illegal trade (ie valuable tiger bone) (Mainka, S.A., J.A. Mills, 1995)
|
|
9
|
- ~13% TCM meds require animal derivatives (Still, J, 2003)
- ++ difficult → conclusions re:efficacy vast majority of animal
products cuz usually part of complex remedy (Still, J., 2003)
- ++++ difficult issue to address = culturally entrenched practices
associated with wildlife exploitation. Even if we were to prove the
inefficacity → cultural tendencies and attitudes resistant to
change
- In most Asian countries, animals = exploitable resource + value based on
utility (Mainka, S.A., J.A. Mills, 1995)
- Animal trophies → tributary gifts
|
|
10
|
- Wildlife foods = ++ quality → better health (Yi-Ming, L., 1998)
- High demand → ‘delicacy’ for the wealthy + despite prohibitory
laws,common menu items (Vietnam) (Ibid)
- Same ancient legends at base of TCM = sources of belief in magical
powers attributed to tiger → sometimes kept by farmers as
talismans to protect produce (Plowden, C., D. Bowles, 1997)
- Tiger teeth + claws sold in gold stores → amulets and pendants to
ward off evil spirits (Shepard, C.R., N. Magnus, 2004)
|
|
11
|
- Despite tiger’s enlistment (1975) appendix I, CITES → 5 of 8
subspecies. 3 of these → extinction = impending and major threat (Mills,
J., P. Jackson)
|
|
12
|
- Surviving subspecies (1994) estimation:
- 30-80 South China tigers: Panthera tigris amoyensis
|
|
13
|
- 150 Siberian or Amur tigers: Panthera tigris altaica
|
|
14
|
- 400-500 Sumatran tigers: Panthera tigris sumatrae
|
|
15
|
- 1-recent growth in world pops + accompanying destruction of natural
habitat
- 2-purported threat to human pops
- 3-destruction of livestock in rural regions of Asia
- 4- imp ascribed to TB (primarily), organs + other body parts promoted
+++TCM (Shepard, C.R., N. Magnus, 2004)
|
|
16
|
- 1st ref to TB in TCM doctrine → 1500 yrs → herbal compendium
Mingyi Bielu or Records of Famous Physicians (Nowell, 2004)
- ~ Every part useful in TCM (Mills, Jackson, 1994; Still, 2003; Nowell,
2004)
- -Eyeballs - epilepsy
- -tail - various skin diseases
- -bile - convulsions in children
- -whiskers – toothache
- -urine - rheumatism
- -fecal matter - hemorrhoids
- -penis - imp component of powerful sexual tonic
- -brain - laziness and acne
- -BONE (+++humerus) most sacred + most useful
|
|
17
|
- Primary use → Tx rheumatism
- Also alleviates weakness, stiffness, paralysis ++ lower back + legs (Mills,
J., Jackson, P)
- Ground up → pills, plasters +decoctions
- Segmented + soaked in wine. 10 mL → relief from headaches +
rheumatic discomforts
- Active ingredients → Ca++ + protein
- Daily dose: rheumatic Tx ~ 3-6/day.
- -at this rate → 1-2kg/yr
- -each tiger ~ 20 kg
|
|
18
|
- High market value maintains majority of wildlife destruction throughout
Asia (Pratt et al., 2004)
- Profits from one average tiger skeleton → > 10 yrs salary in 7
of 14 tiger range states (Mills, J., Jackson, P., 1994) (China,
Indonesia, Malaysia, Nepal, Russia, Thailand, Bangladesh, Vietnam,
India, Bhutan, Cambodia, Lao PDR, Myanmar and North Korea)
- Sells int’l black market from 12-375 US$/kg (Mainka, S.A., Mills, J.A)
|
|
19
|
- extent of trade in tiger products not known bc vast majority within the
black market (Von Hippel, 2002)
- Much of data → CITES reports + some CITES parties have policy of
not reporting trade in tiger if certain criteria not met (Mills, J.,
Jackson, P., 1994)
- -if not specifically recognized as tiger product
- -if assumed counterfeit → report likely excluded (protocols have
changed in many countries)
- -some claim to contain tiger bi-product do not
- -some do contain tiger product + don’t mention it
- -forensic techniques to detect TB do not yet exist
- -certain major exporters not CITES members → their data goes
unreported
|
|
20
|
- China is major importer, exporter + consumer of TB products
- 1990-92 → exported > 27 million units of tiger medicines + wine
(Mainka, S.A., Mills, J.A., 1995)
- 1970-1993 - Indonesia (largest exporter of TB in the world) →
>3994kg TB → 2619kg exported after became CITES member (1979) (Ibid;
Shepard et al., 2004)
- Other major importers:Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and the USA
|
|
21
|
- May 23, 1993 China → prohibition on importation, exportation, sale,
purchase or transport of TB into China
- use of all by-products → discontinued in all meds
- Meds produced + available at that point → forbidden to be sold and
ordered disposed of w/in 6 mths (Yi-Ming et al., 1998)
- Destruction of millions of products containing or purporting to contain
tiger parts
|
|
22
|
- Ban = successful in ↓ open market trade.
- -one study → no tiger products in 110 TCM trade market stalls
surveyed btw 1994-6 (Yi-Ming et al., 1998)
- Number of pharm companies producing TCM meds ↓ ++
- -another study → raw bone preps available in 59% targeted
pharmacies in early 90s → ↓ by late 90s → < 1% (Nowell,
2004)
|
|
23
|
- 1972, national legislation → Indonesia → protect Sumatran
tiger
- -1990 - updated w passage of Act of the Republic of Indonesia on
Conservation of Living Resources and Ecosystems → Sumatran tiger
gets full protection (Plowden et al., 1997)
- -1992 → declare possession of all tiger “trophies, mounts or other
parts” + for these - obtain permits (Ibid)
- 1969 - Siberian tiger listed as “rare and precious species” in the
Ministry of Forestry documents.
- 1975 - South tiger obtains 1st protection and listed in Regulation
Regarding the Protection of Wildlife Resources as protected by
controlled hunting.
- 1979 - South China tiger finally obtains full protection. By 1982, only 150-200 remain (Tilson
et al., 1997)
|
|
24
|
- 1987, last remaining sub-species of tiger (Siberian/Amur tiger) added to
Appendix I of CITES → officially complete interdiction on tiger
trade
- Despite ↑ intolerance of poaching, late 1990s shows little
indication of a major ↓ in tiger poaching (Nowell, 2004)
|
|
25
|
- March 1994 – 11 of Asia’s range states come tog → Global Tiger
Forum
- inter-gov’t + int’l org which includes members who have voluntarily
united w common goal → protecting limited pop Asian tigers (www.globaltiger.org/)
- supports workshops on wildlife management, training officers re:
wildlife + habitat conservation, survey + data collection + research
into forensic techs for TB identification
|
|
26
|
- Tighter regulation of trade - successful re:domestic + int’l open-market
trade (Nowell, 2004)
- -greater enforcement of laws internationally
- -to joining of both more range and non-range consumer states to CITES
(late 1990s - Cambodia + Myanmar → CITES → only Lao PRD,
Bhutan + N Korea non-member range-states (China → 1981)
- Despite this, no evidence that underground trade or poaching ↓
- -impossibility to obtaining precise data
- -black market tiger trade is slowly being transformed into “army of
ants” trade → large no people smuggling small vols of goods
through variety of channels (Nowell, 2004)
|
|
27
|
- Controlled farming attempted in some regions of Asia
- China + Thailand - large captive tiger pops once considered ‘farms’ (Nowell,
2004)
- Established late 80s, early 90s following Chinese govt’s declaration to
replete ↓ wildlife stock meds.
- Not a viable solution
- -supporters → stable, legal bone source → ease poaching
pressures
- -Mills + Jackson (1994)→ 2 reasons should be discouraged:
- 1- urgency to save wild tiger + its natural habitat → attention
should be exclusively focused on this aspect of the problem. Farming tigers risks diverting focus
to captive tigers and, consequently, taking it away from wild tigers.
- 2- dishonest traders can pass off wild tiger bones from farms → ↑
commercial demand for TB and
concomitantly ↑ poaching pressure, possibly enough to see the
complete disappearance of the wild tiger
|
|
28
|
- As a substitute for TB, China has been promoting the use of sailong gu,
which is bone from a common mole rat (Nowell, 2004)
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
- Use of bear products in TCM dates back 3000 yrs (Mills, 1992)
- With rhino horn, ginseng + deer musk, bear bile is considered among the
most powerful of traditional cures (Ibid)
- Exploitation of bears for TCM problematic for diff reasons than those of
tiger.
- China - bypass wildlife exploitation + legal probs → instauration
of bear farming.
- -began w 1985 gov’t decision to replenish depleted wildlife products
|
|
31
|
- Bear farming for bile → exploitation of bears + makes bile
available to larger pop at a ↓ cost → used ++ regularly in a
++ no of med compounds → ↑ demand (Mills, 1992)
- Also, require replacement → progeny of captive bears but ↑
demands for bile + ↑ no of farms = need for wild bears to overcome
the population discrepancy
|
|
32
|
- Derivatives of all bear subspecies acceptable but preference is
undoubtedly for Asiatic black (Selenarctos thibetanus) and Brown bears (Ursus
arctos) (Mainka, S.A, J.A. Mills, 1995)
|
|
33
|
- Number Asiatic black bears still in the wild → ? but surely ↓
as a function of demand + loss of habitat (Mills, 1992)
- Pop of brown bears, although wide-spread, is also ↓ principally →
demand
- American Black Bear - beginning to face ↑ grim future.
- -reflects TCM’s impact int’l. N American bears ↑ popular target
for poaching (Twiss et al., 1999)
- -Bears from all corners of the world will be used to supply demand, stem
++ from S Korea, Taiwan and Japan (Mills, 1992)
|
|
34
|
- Most bear parts are used
- Components of >74 med preparations (Mainka, S.A., J.A. Mills, 1995)
- TCM prescribes bear bile, fat, meat, paws, spinal cord, blood and bones
as Tx for intestinal + cardiac disease, parasite + bacterial infs,
allergies, pain, high blood pressure, certain cancers etc (Mills, 1992)
|
|
35
|
- Bear bile - ++ exploited for analgesic + antipyretic properties
- Tx: burns, fever, internal bleeding, hemorrhoids, stomach ulcers and
gallbladder diseases (Mainka, S.A., Mills, J.A., 1995)
- scientifically proven healing properties for Tx human liver disease (Mills,
1992)
- Active ingredient = tauro-ursodeoxycholic acid (USDA) + is widely used
in W med to dissolve gallstones in the place of Cx (Mainka, S.A., Mills,
J.A., 1995)
|
|
36
|
- CITES regulates int’l trade in bear parts, but much remains to be done
regarding securing such interactions → largely due to principal
consumer countries not being CITES members (South Korea + Taiwan)
- Smuggling facilitated bc bear gallbladders closely resemble other
unprotected species.
- Diff only possible w lab tests → not feasible in most situations.
- This opens market to other countries l → less-desired bear
subspecies can be readily sold.
|
|
37
|
- Because of this, in 1992, the American Black Bear added to Appendix II
of CITES (species not necessarily threatened w extinction, but in which
trade must be controlled in to avoid utilization incompatible w their
survival) (Twiss et al., 1999)
|
|
38
|
- USA + Canada → efforts to control domestic involvement in trade
and depletion of wildlife in N America.
- The “Bear Protection Act” was proposed 1997 → 2000 → 2001
- -will make all import, export and interstate commerce of gall-bladders
illegal throughout US (Roberts, 1997)
- In Canada, management of bears is provincial matter (Twiss et al., 1999)
- Laws vary as function of province → loopholes → trade
continues more easily
- -ex illegal to sell bear gallbladders in every province except PEI +
Nova Scotia but possession permitted in certain provinces. If found w bear gall-bladder, before
charges could be pressed, enforcement officers must prove that
merchandise not from a province or jurisdiction which permits sale (Ibid)
|
|
39
|
- Federal legislation responsible for implementation of CITES regulations →
inadequately enforced
- Many other loopholes associated w controlled int’l bear trade beyond
those related to N American legislature
- These are very similar in nature to those discussed in the tiger trade
|
|
40
|
- Current soln to prob of ↓ wildlife pops, esp in China
- 1 bear in captivity → production of bile = 40-50 wild bears (Mainka,
S.A., J.A. Mills, 1995)
- Each bear ~70 mL of bile/day + annual prod of ~ 3 kgs (Mills, 1992)
- 2002: ~ 9000 bears on 167 bile-milking farms (Still, 2003)
|
|
41
|
- Inhumane conditions. Cages barely
large enough to house their bodies (Mills, 1992)
- Has become standard agricultural practice → little attention to
the animal welfare
|
|
42
|
- Consequently, some cages have bars for floors, and are suspended from
ceilings to facilitate milking
|
|
43
|
- Marsupialization → age of 3
- Abdomen incised → tube implanted in gallbladder → bile
drained from bear as soon as produced (Mills, 1992)
- Collected before each meal → twice a day (Mainka, S.A., J.A.
Mills, 1995)
|
|
44
|
- Once extracted → slowly baked into crystalline form + sold as such
or further transformed into various meds (Mills, 1992)
- Once bears cease adequate bile prod → no longer useful
- Has been suggested → killed and other body parts are harvested (Roberts,
1997)
- -single bear paw can be sold for several hundred dollars (Ibid)
|
|
45
|
- possible to replace bear bile w pig bile
- Also 54 herbal remedies → legitimate substitutes (Still, 2003)
- synthetic compound available (identical properties to bear bile USDA) + ↓
costly
- BUT synthetic substitute ↓ appealing TCM advocates
|
|
46
|
- Consequences ?
- -Bears will continue in captivity, in unacceptable conditions +continue
to undergo inhumane manipulations
- -Bears in the wild will continue to disappear - poachers will pawn off
trophies under guise of gov’t farm product
- -Attention concentrated on making bear industry ↑ efficient + ↑
lucrative will hinder conservation efforts + Asia’s wild bear pops will
continue to suffer
|
|
47
|
- Countries implicated in tiger and bear trade and +not yet CITES members
→ encouraged to join (Mills,J., Jackson, P., 1994)
- Domestic legislation in Asian countries needs to be more seriously
enforced
- Adequate penalties should generally be effective in reinforcing
observance of the law
- Judiciaries of implicated countries → informed of significance + consequences of
poaching
- Supply them w documentation referring to previous convictions of
poachers and illegal traders that will encourage sentencing to more
adequately reflect the crime (Ibid)
|
|
48
|
- Although adherence to CITES regulations appears to have improved, fed
gov’ts need to invest + $ into enforcement, ++ supplier countries
- Implies creation of enforcement units specialized in matters of illegal
trade + poaching
- This is ++ important in China whose underground trade network is likely
among the most highly organized given its pivotal role in wildlife trade
|